I have a client that fell victim to an unscrupulous realtor. Basically the client was pursuaded to purchase 3 homes as investments which would be flipped within a couple months. The problem was that it happened to be end of 2006. There are other details involved, but my issue is this; I want to examine the standard of care for an agent. Hopefully some agents who view this can express what they consider to be their fiduciary duty when advising a client. At what point should a realtor be held liable for their recommendations?
As a follow up on this issue, what should be considered reasonable efforts in promoting a listed property? Is a single picture on the MLS sufficient? what response time is appropriate in responding to inquiries?
My goal as an attorney is to praise the good and admonish the bad. I think in doing this, the real estate industry is well served by protecting the reputation of the profession. Hopefully i am not alone in this view, but would love to hear feedback.
Duty Of An AgentI have a client that fell victim to an unscrupulous realtor. Basically the client was pursuaded to purchase 3 homes as investments which would be flipped within a couple months. The proble...
Added On: 07/10/2008 10:08
Ask Signature CapitalWhat are the differences between a condominium, a townhouse and a co-op?
A townhouse is a style of construction, whereas condominium and co-op are types of ownership. A townhouse is basically a bu...
Added On: 07/10/2008 09:54
Articles Page: 1
Articles RSS Feed